Sunday, November 18, 2018

A Tale of Two Tiers featuring Balanchine's Jewels

I saw Balanchine’s Jewels twice the past Fall season: once with my family (9/22/18, matinee) and once by myself (9/25/18, evening). My family outing was a special one, as this was the first time my brother, his new wife/my new sister-in-law, my mom, and my dad were to see the ballet together. We splurged on nice seats in the orchestra. When I went myself, I sat in the fourth ring clutching my newly bought tickets via the 30 for 30 program NYCB has with its younger audience.
The same ballet with different seats still results in different experience, especially when one seat is far closer to the stage than the other. The orchestra seat offered an intimate experience. In Emeralds, I feel Tiler Peck’s airy and sparkly presence and see spirits of nature embody her. Unity Phelan’s youthful aura reminds me of my freer days. In Rubies, Claire Kretzschmar (who replaced Emily Kikta) dazzled as the tall girl and her later promotion to soloist evidently shows. Though I am usually enamored by Sterling Hyltin, her dancing as rubies seemed more cautious and less jazzy than I wished. Indeed, in New York Times article, she reveals that she was coached to dance differently than what her muscles were trained to do. In Diamonds, a special shout-out goes out to Joseph Gordon, whose boyish stature does not reflect his grand, yet subtle dancing; my whole family was very impressed with him and not surprised by his promotion to principal dancer a few weeks later. Sara Mearns was dramatic and exciting as always.

The fourth ring seat offered a holistic experience and allowed me to enjoy the corp de ballet more than the orchestra seat did. In Emeralds, I could see the organic shapes that the corp dancers formed, and in Diamonds, I could see more uniform formations. Though I could not  as easily view the principal dancers in this performance, I would like to point out Lauren Lovette and Gonzalo Garcia for a fun, jazzy, and jovial performance. From this performance, I had a thought. Perhaps these intricate formations that Balanchine and many other choreographers from NYCB serve those who cannot afford seats in the orchestra. The ballets are choreographed so that every single person in the audience can have at least one moment where they have the best view. For example, the pas de deux and solos that the principal roles are best enjoyed up-close; the audience can see the nuances dancers include and can see the presence of the dancer. However, when the corp de ballet perform, it’s like when one sees a mosaic art. Up-close, one sees pieces that do not connect necessarily, but once one walks farther back, the seemly-unconnected pieces come to fruition and can be fully appreciated. That is why the fourth ring exists.

I hope you enjoyed my commentary! Please leave comments about your thoughts on the ballets! 





[1] Kourlas, “At City Ballet, Learning From Dancers Who Learned From Balanchine.”

No comments:

Post a Comment

A True Spectacular: The Rockettes

The first time I saw the Christmas Spectacular, my mom and I were 1 hour late, and I did not remember a thing. For a numbe...